It has been quite a while. Exams, you see. Blogging wasn't an option
over the last month. Each time exams get over, I look back and wonder how I
managed to do away with the distractions and pat myself on the back. Yeah, I
just did too.
One might question the 'pat'. "Every student takes up
examinations. Writing a series of examinations is not an achievement after all.”
I answer, "Writing Anna University examinations is." Yes, I can
hear the seniors telling me what I have seen is just the beginning.
After being put through correction antics in the first
semester, it was a deliberate decision from my side to be a little more
cautious this time. I had to choose the right books to learn from, the right
authors.
Here is a stereotypical classification of authors.
1) Local author : Writing an Anna University examination?, get a book of
hers/his.
2) Local-foreign author : A rare breed of Indian authors that exhibits
traits of good foreign authors.
3) Foreign-local author : A foreign author who has taken inspiration
from the ones belonging to the first category.
4) Foreign author : The ideal author.
I had to choose books from
the first category.
Who is a local author? (The definition is a product of my imagination and the 'local' has
no racist intentions)
A highly qualified academic author who is better known for his expertise
in training a candidate to write an examination than for his scholarly works.
The 'local' refers to the author's origin in the literal sense. However, as the
stereotype goes, the 'local' relates to the made up definition of a local
author. Call a local author book ‘LAB’.
Books by such authors are the kind of ones most sought after right
before the examination. You are most likely to hear the shopkeeper say,
"Out of stock" for the popular books. These books are going to give
you the 'key words' the examiner is looking for. If you were wondering how to
fill pages to to make up a sixteen-mark-answer, you have the answer. The book
is like a halo over your head. It is the solution to your problems.
LABs are visually distinctly identifiable. The cover of such books
contains highlighted features apart from a random diagram from one of the
lessons. A typical LAB contains 'salient features' such as previous years'
solved question papers, two mark questions, and well highlighted notes that
remind you you are only preparing for an examination and not learning. Don't be
surprised to find grammatical errors and logical inconsistencies. Once you
choose to read the book, train to live with it.
Books such as these do not facilitate learning. When you spend time
reading these books, you spend time trying to satisfy a person, the paper
evaluator.
The much criticized examination pattern and the unworthy-of-a-read local
author books go well together. It is almost as though the intention of the
author is not to make the student understand but to only show him a way to
crack the examination.
What is flawed with the examination?
- The pattern allows you to
skip about a third of the entire syllabus and still get an A. That tells a
lot.
- It evidently fails to test
the thinking capabilities of the student. It tests only
what the student remembers and not what she/he has learnt.
- Questions score in ambiguity
and fail in specificity. One walks out of the examination hall way too
often wondering if what she/he had answered was what she/he was asked
for.
- Specificity in one's answer is equally vital. A student goes all out and unleashes every
dog when she/he is unsure of what is required of her/him. This is when
students come up with exceedingly long, irrelevant answers.
LABs and AU examinations make a good combination. This is what makes the
flawed system well established. The criticized but seemingly unquestioned
system is severely outdated and requires a revamp.
A change in the pattern of examination could bring about a change for
the better as the examinations influence so many other factors. Most notably :
- It could get rid of the
stereotypical LABs. Local authors would start producing better books.
- It could bring about a change
from the current exam-oriented teaching style.
- The new pattern could be
such that it judges a student by his intelligence and not by his memory.
- A good change would silence
the critics.
Preparing for an examination needn't be a burden after all. A change
could well establish learning as an enjoyable experience and produce better
engineers from its students.
