These
are interesting times. While our lives become increasingly complex and the variables that affect our actions pile up by the day, it is easy to
understand why we find ourselves uncontrollably driven by circumstances around
us. Very often, I spend my time doing something that I feel like doing
and is not what I desire to be doing. The question is not about productivity
related to a certain action performed by a human, it is rather about the action
itself. Why is there a gap between what we desire to do and what we happen to
do? I am no motivational speaker and more often than not, I do not have answers
to pertinent questions of the day. But as I have learnt recently, the answers
to a lot of our questions lie in our willingness to take time, map a
cause-effect chain, and intelligibly visualize why what happens,
happens.
Let
us get into the act. You have just had a relaxed and lazy weekend. Monday
morning is greeting you with bright sunshine as you wake up. You stretch
yourself and pick up your phone right when you decide to open your eyes. Within
a minute after you wake up, you glance at your notifications - friend requests,
reminders, events, emails, news headlines and text messages, all at once. You
do this so ritualistically that the movements are a part of your muscle memory.
As you walk into the bathroom, your mind is populated with memories related to
the notifications you just read. As you turn on the shower, you are either
pondering over something that didn't go as well as you wanted it to or
something that you are afraid wouldn't. The day goes on and you are never too
far away from your notifications because you've got high-speed internet and
Android 8.1 running on your flagship mobile phone with 6GB of RAM and a
Snapdragon 845 processor - basically, scrolling through your feed and consuming
content is ridiculously fast and plain easy.
The
notification light on our smartphones does what placing deliciously cooked food
in front of our eyes when we are starving does. We must consume it. Not very long ago, if we scrolled down enough on our Facebook feeds, content that we had already viewed would show up. It would remind us that we were pushing for more content that didn't exist and that it is time we got off the website/app. Now, software engineers
are doing everything they can to ensure that we are provided with an optimum
(maximum) amount of content with no duplications. The quality of content shared
with users is undoubtedly questionable but it is still content and when
consuming it is plain easy, the quality doesn't bother many. As users,
we also get to create content because we are entitled to free speech. If free
speech simply means that we are allowed voice out our opinions and when a
platform allows us to do just that, how do we predict the quality of content and its actual worth of consumption before we even choose to consume
it? The answer is - we don't know. Consequently, we sell ourselves to
content that is intended to be sold to us, a bit too easily, because doing so
is just plain easy.
But
is selling ourselves to content detrimental to our quality of existence? One
could argue, "so what?". As long as the world functions and everyone
continues to live a life that (s)he is satisfied with, who cares? "So
what?", I don't know. But "who cares?" - we
care and we fail to recognize that we do. As we inexplicably sell ourselves to
all the content we consume, we miss out on opportunities (time) to create a
personal space that we intrinsically love. How often have we cut off from
hobbies that we pursued as kids with joy and why? What are we if we don't create? I would assume that it would be
healthy to spend as much time creating as we do consuming content. To better
picture the difference between creating and consuming, we could visualize them
as a different states of existence, consumption being closer to non-existence and
creation being close to true-existence. In the time that we get with ourselves,
obligations aside, if we choose to only consume content that is easily
available to us, we are failing to create individualistic depictions of our
true thoughts.
"To
create, you need not be "creative". Creativity is not an inborn
characteristic. Prodigies do not exist. It is differences in the degree of
training that influence the output from a certain system (in this case, an
individual).", said my professor during his lecture about viewing
creativity as an exact science. "Only creativity coupled with integrity
can solve real problems. Nature cannot be fooled and to solve problems
that mar human life, freedom of thought must exist." Clearly, we are all
free to think, but contextually speaking, "freedom of thought" here
refers to thoughts unconditioned by a collective mindset that circumstances of
our times ingrain in us.
The uncertainty associated with "what's the next story on my Facebook feed" is certainly exciting but by giving in, we allow our minds to be littered with hastily-created content. Social media feeds are not very different from soap operas that are low on quality content but hugely popular. It is a masala offering that ties a lot of our lives together and attempts to entertain us while stealthily studying our usage patterns to display ads that best suit our needs. In simpler words, consuming low quality content in excessive amounts impairs our ability to create. With no creativity, there is no innovation and with no innovation, we cannot solve real problems that we are faced with. The balance is the key and to achieve this balance, we must make a purposive effort to differentiate between good and bad at a very personal and fundamental level. Provided we sort this out, we will have our answer to the question "why are we what we are?".
